Blog

Quality customer service is a team effort

In the world of networking and solid-state devices, there's a puzzling phenomenon: supporting older assets often costs more than supporting new ones. Intuitively, this seems backward. If devices are more prone to failure when they're new—due to early-life failures—shouldn't support costs be higher at the beginning of their lifecycle? Moreover, many professionals find that older, more stable assets cause fewer issues than their newer counterparts. So, what's driving the increase in support costs for older equipment?Early-Life Failures vs. Wear-Out Failures Firstly, it's essential to understand the bathtub curve, a concept in reliability engineering that illustrates the failure rate of devices over time. The curve has three distinct phases:Early-Life Failures (Infant Mortality): Higher failure rates occur shortly after a device is deployed, often due to manufacturing defects or early-use stress. Useful Life: Failure rates stabilize and remain relatively low. Devices operate as expected with minimal issues. Wear-Out Failures: As devices age, components wear out, leading to an increase in failure rates. While it's true that many devices experience early failures, this doesn't necessarily translate to higher support costs for new assets. Warranties and initial support agreements often cover these early issues, mitigating additional costs for the user.Factors Driving Up Support Costs for Older Assets Several reasons explain why supporting older assets becomes more expensive over time:1. End of Manufacturer Support Manufacturers eventually declare products End-of-Life (EOL) or End-of-Support (EOS). Once this happens, obtaining official support, updates, or replacement parts becomes challenging and costly. Third-party support providers may fill the gap but often at a premium price due to the scarcity of parts and specialized knowledge required.2. Scarcity of Replacement Parts As devices age, replacement parts become scarce. Manufacturing of these parts slows down or stops altogether, and keeping an inventory of obsolete components becomes expensive. This scarcity drives up the cost of maintenance and repairs.3. Increased Labor Costs Technicians skilled in servicing older equipment may be fewer in number. Training new technicians to handle outdated technology requires time and resources, which can increase labor costs associated with support.4. Compatibility and Security Issues Older assets may not be compatible with newer systems, leading to integration challenges. They may also lack the latest security features, making them vulnerable to cyber threats. Mitigating these issues often requires additional support and investment.5. Regulatory Compliance In some industries, regulations evolve, and older equipment may not meet new standards. Ensuring compliance can involve costly upgrades or additional support measures.The Hidden Costs of Maintaining Old Assets While older assets might seem stable, hidden costs can accumulate:Energy Inefficiency: Older equipment often consumes more power, leading to higher operational costs. Downtime Risks: The likelihood of unexpected failures increases with age, potentially causing operational disruptions. Opportunity Costs: Relying on outdated technology may prevent organizations from leveraging new features that enhance productivity and competitiveness. Encouraging Asset Replacement The increased support costs for older assets often act as an economic incentive to adopt newer technology. Manufacturers and service providers might structure their pricing to:Promote Upgrades: Higher support costs make the option of purchasing new equipment more financially attractive. Ensure Standardization: Encouraging the use of the latest devices helps maintain consistency in support services and simplifies training requirements for support staff. Are We Missing Something? It's crucial to balance the perceived stability of older assets with the long-term benefits of upgrading:Enhanced Performance: Newer devices typically offer better performance, efficiency, and features. Improved Security: Up-to-date equipment receives the latest security updates, protecting against emerging threats. Cost Savings Over Time: While the initial investment is higher, the total cost of ownership may be lower due to reduced maintenance and operational expenses. Conclusion The increase in support costs for older assets is a complex issue influenced by factors like manufacturer support policies, parts availability, and the evolving technological landscape. While older devices may appear more stable in the short term, the long-term implications—rising support costs, increased failure risks, and missed opportunities for improvement—suggest that investing in newer assets can be more cost-effective and beneficial.

The Paradox of Support Costs: Why Supporting Older Assets Costs More

After working in the Independent Reseller world for over a decade, there are some definite ways to save on your maintenance costs. Here they are in somewhat of an order of priority 1. Firstly distinguish between what requires software support? 2. Layer 2 devices do not need to have OEM support, most give this away for free. 3. Look at devices that are aging that have been stable in the network for a while, they will be the more expensive ones 4. Look to see where you might have density in one area, these might be an opportunity for self sparing. 5. Look at where you might have 4 hour support, their might be an opportunity to keep a spare and reduce the SLA down to NBD 6. Ask a Third Party Maintenance provider to quote you and don't just look at the OEM Have I missed any? What ways have you managed to save on your maintenance costs before?More often than not businesses just adopt what the OEM's are prescribing. We also see the emergence of security insisting that devices are supported as CEO's become concerned about potential holes in the network.&nbsp; However its important to consider the motivations of the OEM's are ensure that the interests of your business and money is being placed first.&nbsp; For any other considerations on ways to make savings be sure to drop us a line.&nbsp;

5 Easy Ways to Save On Your Network Maintenance

As the pace of technological advancement continues to accelerate, the issue of e-waste has become an increasingly pressing concern. While recycling is a vital component of sustainability, it is only one piece of the puzzle. To truly address the environmental impact of e-waste, we must consider the entire lifecycle of electronic devices, from production to disposal. In this blog, we'll explore the key challenges associated with e-waste and discuss how comprehensive management can promote sustainability.1. Toxic Components E-waste contains hazardous materials such as lead, mercury, cadmium, and brominated flame retardants. These substances can leach into soil and water, posing serious health and environmental risks. Proper handling and disposal are crucial to prevent these toxins from contaminating our ecosystem.2. Resource Depletion Many electronic devices are made from finite and rare materials like gold, silver, and palladium. The extraction and processing of these materials are energy-intensive and environmentally damaging. Inefficient recovery processes mean valuable materials are often lost, leading to the unnecessary depletion of natural resources.3. Informal Recycling Practices In many developing countries, e-waste is often processed informally, with workers exposed to hazardous substances without proper protective equipment. Informal recycling methods, such as open-air burning and acid baths, release harmful pollutants into the environment, causing significant health and environmental damage.4. Data Security Improper disposal of electronic devices can lead to data breaches if sensitive information is not securely erased. This is a significant concern for both individuals and organizations, emphasizing the need for secure data destruction practices before recycling or refurbishing devices.5. Legal and Regulatory Issues Many countries have strict regulations regarding e-waste management. Companies must comply with these laws to avoid penalties and ensure responsible disposal. Additionally, the export of e-waste to developing nations, where it is processed under poor conditions, is often illegal and unethical.6. Economic Challenges Proper recycling of e-waste can be costly, and the economic incentives for informal recycling can undermine formal, safer processes. Fluctuations in the market value of recycled materials can also impact the economic viability of recycling programs.7. Consumer Awareness and Behavior Many consumers are unaware of the environmental impact of e-waste and the importance of proper disposal. Changing disposal habits and increasing awareness are crucial to reducing the growing e-waste problem.8. Technological Obsolescence The fast pace of technological innovation leads to shorter device lifespans and an increase in e-waste generation. Some manufacturers design products with limited lifespans or make repairs difficult, encouraging consumers to buy new products more frequently.9. Infrastructure and Access Inefficient or inadequate e-waste collection systems can hinder proper recycling and disposal. Limited access to certified recycling facilities, especially in rural or remote areas, can make proper e-waste management challenging.10. Corporate Responsibility Companies need to take responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their products, including end-of-life management. Emphasizing eco-design and modularity can make products easier to repair, refurbish, and recycle.Evaluating E-Waste Providers: A Checklist To ensure your e-waste is managed responsibly, use this checklist to evaluate potential e-waste providers:Certification and ComplianceAre they certified by recognized bodies (e.g., R2, e-Stewards)? Do they comply with local and international e-waste regulations? Data SecurityDo they offer secure data destruction services? Can they provide a certificate of data destruction? Environmental PracticesHow do they handle hazardous materials? Do they follow best practices for minimizing environmental impact? Recycling and RecoveryWhat percentage of materials are recovered and recycled? Do they have efficient processes for recovering valuable materials? Transparency and ReportingDo they provide detailed reports on the handling and processing of e-waste? Are they transparent about their recycling and disposal methods? Worker SafetyDo they ensure safe working conditions for their employees? Are workers provided with proper protective equipment? Local HandlingDo they keep all e-waste materials within Australia for processing? Do they avoid exporting e-waste to developing countries? Community and Environmental ImpactDo they engage in community education and awareness programs? Do they contribute positively to environmental conservation efforts? By using this checklist, you can ensure that your e-waste is managed in a way that promotes sustainability and minimizes environmental impact. At [Your Company Name], we pride ourselves on keeping all materials within Australia, ensuring no products go overseas for handling, and maintaining the highest standards of environmental and data security practices.&nbsp; Together, we can make a significant difference in reducing the environmental impact of e-waste and promoting a more sustainable future.

Addressing the Challenges of E-Waste: A Comprehensive Approach to Sustainable Management

<h2>Unveiling the Mystery: Why Could Some IT Products Be More Expensive in Australia</h2>In the global marketplace, product pricing disparities across countries are a well-documented phenomenon. Australia, in particular, has often been on the higher end of the pricing spectrum for various goods and services. The whitepaper from RecircIT delves into the complexities behind these price differentials, shedding light on both traditional factors and emerging trends that influence the cost of IT products in Australia.<h3>Traditional Factors Contributing to Higher Prices:</h3>1. Exchange Rates: Fluctuations in currency exchange rates significantly impact the cost of imported goods.2. Taxes and Tariffs: The Goods and Services Tax (GST) and import tariffs add to the overall cost3. Distribution Costs: Australia’s geographic distance from manufacturing centers leads to higher shipping and logistics expenses4. Market Size and Demand: The smaller market size compared to countries like the United States results in reduced economies of scale and increased per-unit production costs.5. Regulatory Compliance: Additional expenses to comply with Australian regulations and standards add to the overall cost.<h3>Emerging Trends and Unexplained Price Increases</h3>1. Market Power and Monopoly: Dominant companies, such as Cisco, may leverage their market power to raise prices without clear justifications2. Price Discrimination: Companies may charge different prices in different markets based on perceived willingness to pay.3. Brand Perception and Premium Pricing: Brands may justify higher prices by leveraging perceptions of exclusivity or luxury.4. Lack of Transparency: Companies sometimes increase prices without providing detailed explanations, leaving consumers and industry observers in the dark.The Cisco Conundrum Cisco’s practice of announcing price increases every six months without offering comprehensive explanations has raised eyebrows within the industry. While Cisco’s dominance in the networking and technology sector affords it some pricing power, the lack of transparency surrounding these price hikes has fueled speculation and skepticism among consumers.Conclusion The pricing of products in Australia is influenced by a combination of traditional factors and emerging trends. While conventional factors like exchange rates and distribution costs continue to play significant roles, recent instances of unexplained price increases underscore the need for greater transparency and accountability in pricing practices.A Circular Solution RecircIT suggests that a viable solution to mitigate high capital expenditure on IT products is to utilize circular products (pre-owned). By leveraging RecircIT’s circular economy approach, companies can reduce costs significantly while ensuring quality through rigorous testing and advanced replacement lifetime warranties. This approach not only offers financial benefits but also supports sustainability by extending the life cycle of IT products.For a detailed analysis and to explore how you can achieve substantial savings, download the full whitepaper from RecircIT. Discover how adopting circular economy practices can transform your IT procurement strategy and contribute to a more sustainable future.

Unveiling the Mystery: Why Could Some IT Products Be More Expensive in Australia?

<h3>Greenwashing: A Growing Concern for IT Managers and CIOs</h3> In the age of heightened environmental awareness, businesses are increasingly promoting their green initiatives to appeal to eco-conscious consumers and stakeholders. However, not all claims of sustainability are genuine. The practice of greenwashing—where companies exaggerate or falsify their environmental efforts—has become a significant concern, particularly for decision-makers like IT managers and CIOs who are responsible for steering their organizations towards sustainable practices.The Problem: Why Decision Makers Are Worried Reputational Risk: Greenwashing can severely damage a company's reputation. If stakeholders discover that a company’s sustainability claims are exaggerated or false, it can lead to loss of trust and credibility, which is difficult to regain. Regulatory and Legal Risks: With increasing regulations around environmental claims, companies caught greenwashing can face legal actions, fines, and sanctions. This creates an additional layer of risk for businesses trying to navigate the sustainability landscape. Financial Implications: Investing in genuine sustainability initiatives can be costly. However, the financial repercussions of being caught greenwashing—such as lawsuits, loss of business, and decreased stock value—can be far greater. Employee Morale and Recruitment: Companies known for genuine sustainability efforts attract and retain talent better than those accused of greenwashing. Employees, especially younger generations, prefer to work for organizations that align with their values, including environmental responsibility. Impact on Sustainable IT Initiatives: For CIOs and IT managers, greenwashing can undermine the effectiveness of sustainable IT initiatives. If stakeholders question the authenticity of green claims, it can lead to skepticism and resistance to implementing further sustainable practices within the organization. Research and Findings Recent studies highlight the prevalence and impact of greenwashing:A report by TerraChoice found that out of 2,219 products making green claims, over 98% were found to be committing at least one of the seven sins of greenwashing. The European Commission and national consumer authorities found that 42% of green claims made by companies were exaggerated, false, or deceptive. <h3>Checklist: </h3>Qualifying the Authenticity of a Company's Efforts To help IT managers and CIOs ensure that their companies and partners are genuinely committed to sustainability, here’s a checklist of questions to ask:Transparency:Does the company provide clear and accessible information about its sustainability initiatives? Are there third-party audits or certifications validating their claims? Consistency:Are the company’s sustainability claims consistent across all platforms and communications? Do they have a history of making similar claims, or is this a new development? Specificity:Are the claims specific and detailed, rather than vague or generic? Do they provide measurable goals and results? Commitment:Is there evidence of long-term commitment to sustainability, such as ongoing projects and initiatives? Does the company invest in sustainable practices even when it might not be profitable in the short term? Accountability:Are there systems in place for tracking and reporting progress on sustainability goals? Is the company willing to acknowledge and address areas where it falls short? Third-Party Endorsements:Does the company have endorsements from reputable environmental organizations? Are there industry recognitions or awards for their sustainability efforts? Employee and Community Involvement:Are employees and the community engaged in the company’s sustainability efforts? Is there a culture of sustainability within the organization? By using this checklist, IT managers and CIOs can better navigate the complex landscape of corporate sustainability, ensuring that their organizations make genuine and impactful contributions to environmental stewardship. This proactive approach not only mitigates the risks associated with greenwashing but also fosters a culture of transparency and integrity in the IT industry

Greenwashing; A Growing Concern For IT Managers

Technology concept: Dollar sign with circuits

<h2>The Financial Challenge of Getting Cash for Your Waste</h2>Many of us have tried to navigate the ways in which you can get value for old assets. We have heard numerous stories about how frustrating it can be to see all of these old working assets being disposed of when they might still have value. &nbsp;What we know is that the account practices often get in the way. Why is that? If an asset that has been fully depreciated to zero is sold, any proceeds from the sale would typically need to be declared for tax purposes. Here's why:Capital Gain or Loss:&nbsp; &nbsp; When you sell an asset, the difference between the selling price and the asset's adjusted basis (which may be zero if fully depreciated) results in either a capital gain or a capital loss. If the selling price exceeds the adjusted basis, you have a capital gain. If the selling price is less than the adjusted basis, you have a capital loss.Tax Implications: Capital gains are generally taxable, while capital losses may be deductible against capital gains or ordinary income, subject to certain limitations and rules in your tax jurisdiction.Reporting Requirements: Depending on your tax jurisdiction and the nature of the asset, you may need to report the sale and any resulting gain or loss on your tax return. This typically involves completing specific forms or schedules provided by the tax authorities.Documentation: It's important to keep accurate records of the sale, including the selling price, the original cost basis of the asset, any depreciation taken over its useful life, and any expenses related to the sale (such as brokerage fees). This documentation will help you accurately calculate and report any capital gain or loss on your tax return.In summary, even if an asset has been fully depreciated to zero before being sold, any profit from the sale is generally subject to tax and should be declared according to the tax laws in your jurisdiction. Many accounting teams struggle with this and often refuse accepting any profits. This means that e-waste company not only makes money from the cost they charge to you for disposing of the products they also make money from then on selling the products.So what is the alternative? How can you make sure you try and get some form of value? Better still how can you make sure that you can get value and do your part for your sustainability initiatives? Read more on our circular credits here: <a href="https://recircit.com/recircular-it-products/recircular-it-credits" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-mce-href="https://recircit.com/recircular-it-products/recircular-it-credits">ReCircular Credits</a>

News & Articles

The Paradox of Support Costs: Why Supporting Older Assets...

5 Easy Ways to Save On Your Network Maintenance

Addressing the Challenges of E-Waste: A Comprehensive App...

Unveiling the Mystery: Why Could Some IT Products Be More...

Greenwashing; A Growing Concern For IT Managers

Why Are You Getting No Value From Your Old IT Assets?